You are able to avoid two calls to the bookmaker and lock in today’s line on a later game by telling your bookmaker you wish to make an “if” bet. “If” bets can also be made on two games kicking off at the same time. The bookmaker will wait before the first game is over. If the initial game wins, he will put the same amount on the next game though it has already been played.
Although an “if” bet is in fact two straight bets at normal vig, you cannot decide later that you will no longer want the next bet. As soon as you make an “if” bet, the next bet can not be cancelled, even when the next game hasn’t gone off yet. If the initial game wins, you can have action on the next game. For that reason, there is less control over an “if” bet than over two straight bets. When the 2 games you bet overlap over time, however, the only path to bet one as long as another wins is by placing an “if” bet. Needless to say, when two games overlap over time, cancellation of the next game bet is not an issue. It should be noted, that whenever the 2 games start at different occuring times, most books won’t permit you to fill in the next game later. You have to designate both teams when you make the bet.
You possibly can make an “if” bet by saying to the bookmaker, แทงมวย “I wish to make an ‘if’ bet,” and then, “Give me Team A IF Team B for $100.” Giving your bookmaker that instruction would be the identical to betting $110 to win $100 on Team A, and then, as long as Team A wins, betting another $110 to win $100 on Team B.
If the initial team in the “if” bet loses, there is no bet on the next team. No matter whether the next team wins of loses, your total loss on the “if” bet will be $110 when you lose on the initial team. If the initial team wins, however, you’d have a bet of $110 to win $100 going on the next team. In that case, if the next team loses, your total loss will be just the $10 of vig on the split of the 2 teams. If both games win, you’d win $100 on Team A and $100 on Team B, for a complete win of $200. Thus, the utmost loss on an “if” will be $110, and the utmost win will be $200. That is balanced by the disadvantage of losing the total $110, rather than $10 of vig, each time the teams split with the initial team in the bet losing.
Bettors soon unearthed that how you can steer clear of the uncertainty due to the order of wins and loses is to create two “if” bets putting each team first. Instead of betting $110 on ” Team A if Team B,” you’d bet just $55 on ” Team A if Team B.” and then produce a second “if” bet reversing the order of the teams for another $55. The 2nd bet would put Team B first and Team A second. This kind of double bet, reversing the order of the same two teams, is named an “if/reverse” or sometimes just a “reverse.”
If both teams win, the effect would be the same as you played an individual “if” bet for $100. You win $50 on Team A in the initial “if bet, and then $50 on Team B, for a complete win of $100. In the next “if” bet, you win $50 on Team B, and then $50 on Team A, for a complete win of $100. The two “if” bets together create a total win of $200 when both teams win.
If both teams lose, the effect would also be just like in the event that you played an individual “if” bet for $100. Team A’s loss would cost you $55 in the initial “if” combination, and nothing would look at Team B. In the next combination, Team B’s loss would cost you $55 and nothing would look at to Team A. You’d lose $55 on all the bets for a complete maximum loss of $110 whenever both teams lose.
The difference occurs once the teams split. Instead of losing $110 when the initial team loses and the next wins, and $10 when the initial team wins but the next loses, in the reverse you will lose $60 on a divided no matter which team wins and which loses. It computes this way. If Team A loses you will lose $55 on the initial combination, and have nothing going on the winning Team B. In the next combination, you will win $50 on Team B, and have action on Team A for a $55 loss, producing a net loss on the next mixture of $5 vig. The loss of $55 on the initial “if” bet and $5 on the next “if” bet offers you a combined loss of $60 on the “reverse.” When Team B loses, you will lose the $5 vig on the initial combination and the $55 on the next combination for the same $60 on the split..
We’ve accomplished this smaller loss of $60 as opposed to $110 when the initial team loses without decrease in the win when both teams win. In both the single $110 “if” bet and the 2 reversed “if” bets for $55, the win is $200 when both teams cover the spread. The bookmakers would not put themselves at that type of disadvantage, however. The gain of $50 whenever Team A loses is fully offset by the excess $50 loss ($60 as opposed to $10) whenever Team B could be the loser. Thus, the “reverse” doesn’t actually save us anything, nonetheless it has the benefit of making the chance more predictable, and avoiding the worry regarding which team to put first in the “if” bet.
DON’T, when you can win significantly more than 52.5% or even more of one’s games. If you fail to consistently achieve a profitable percentage, however, making “if” bets when you bet two teams will save you money.
For the winning bettor, the “if” bet adds some luck to your betting equation that doesn’t belong there. If two games are worth betting, then they ought to both be bet. Betting on one should not be made dependent on whether or not you win another. On one other hand, for the bettor who features a negative expectation, the “if” bet will prevent him from betting on the next team whenever the initial team loses. By preventing some bets, the “if” bet saves the negative expectation bettor some vig.
The $10 savings for the “if” bettor results from the truth that he is not betting the next game when both lose. Compared to the straight bettor, the “if” bettor comes with an additional cost of $100 when Team A loses and Team B wins, but he saves $110 when Team A and Team B both lose.
The rule for the winning bettor is exactly opposite. Something that keeps the winning bettor from betting more games is bad, and therefore “if” bets will surely cost the winning handicapper money. Once the winning bettor plays fewer games, he has fewer winners. Remember that the next time someone lets you know that how you can win is to bet fewer games. A good winner never desires to bet fewer games. Since “if/reverses” work out the identical as “if” bets, they both place the winner at the same disadvantage.
Exceptions to the Rule – Each time a Winner Should Bet Parlays and “IF’s”
Just like all rules, there are exceptions. “If” bets and parlays should be made by successful with a positive expectation in just two circumstances::
If you have no other choice and she must bet either an “if/reverse,” a parlay, or an intro; or
When betting co-dependent propositions.
The only time I can think of that you’ve no other choice is if you’re the best man at your friend’s wedding, you are waiting to walk down the aisle, your laptop looked ridiculous in the pocket of one’s tux which means you left it in the vehicle, you simply bet offshore in a deposit account without credit line, the book features a $50 minimum phone bet, you want two games which overlap over time, you pull out your trusty cell 5 minutes before kickoff and 45 seconds before you should walk to the alter with some beastly bride’s maid in a frilly purple dress in your arm, you try to create two $55 bets and suddenly realize you simply have $75 in your account.
While the old philosopher used to state, “Is that what’s troubling you, bucky?” If that’s the case, hold your face up high, put a look on that person, search for the silver lining, and produce a $50 “if” bet in your two teams. Needless to say you might bet a parlay, but as you might find below, the “if/reverse” is a great replacement the parlay if you’re winner.
For the winner, the best method is straight betting. In case of co-dependent bets, however, as already discussed, there is a massive advantage to betting combinations. With a parlay, the bettor gets the main benefit of increased parlay odds of 13-5 on combined bets that have greater than the normal expectation of winning. Since, by definition, co-dependent bets must always be contained within the same game, they must be made as “if” bets. With a co-dependent bet our advantage arises from the truth that we make the next bet only IF among the propositions wins.
It would do us no good to straight bet $110 each on the favorite and the underdog and $110 each on the over and the under. We would simply lose the vig irrespective of how often the favorite and over or the underdog and under combinations won. As we’ve seen, when we play two out of 4 possible results in two parlays of the favorite and over and the underdog and under, we could net a $160 win when one of our combinations comes in. When to find the parlay or the “reverse” when making co-dependent combinations is discussed below.
Choosing Between “IF” Bets and Parlays
Centered on a $110 parlay, which we’ll use for the objective of consistent comparisons, our net parlay win when one of our combinations hits is $176 (the $286 win on the winning parlay minus the $110 loss on the losing parlay). In a $110 “reverse” bet our net win will be $180 each time one of our combinations hits (the $400 win on the winning if/reverse minus the $220 loss on the losing if/reverse).